CG FC200 vs Xhorse Multi Prog: Comparing Programmer Software

When it comes to choosing between the Xhorse Multi Prog and CG FC200 programmers, it’s important to consider their software functionality, particularly in terms of ECU and TCU reading and writing capabilities. In this article, we will compare the two and highlight their differences.

1) Keyboard Functionality:

One drawback of the FC200 is that it does not have keyboard functionality. This means that users can only navigate through the software using the mouse. On the other hand, the Multi Prog allows users to use a keyboard, which is a definite advantage.

2) ECU Menu Arrangement:

In terms of ECU menu arrangement, the Multi Prog falls short. While selecting ECUs, the menu is not arranged in alphabetical order. For example, if you select Audi, the next option might be Porsche, which is not logically arranged.

3) Search Function:

However, the Multi Prog makes up for this with its efficient search function. When searching for specific ECUs, such as Simos, the Multi Prog performs exceptionally well and provides accurate results.

4) Online Updates:

A notable advantage of the Multi Prog is its ability to perform online updates. This includes both software and firmware updates. This feature saves time and ensures that users have access to the latest updates without any hassle.

5) ECU Compatibility:

Both the Multi Prog and FC200 support a wide range of ECUs. However, the Multi Prog has a larger variety of supported ECUs compared to the FC200. For example, the Multi Prog supports ECUs like DCM3.5, DCM6.2A, DCM6.2C, DCM7.1A, DCM7.1B, Valeo V56.x SID807, while the FC200 supports ECUs like GPEC2, GPEC3, Bosch-Valeo J34P, Bosch DCU17PC42, which are not found in the Multi Prog. Similarly, the Multi Prog supports ECUs like 6F3, 6JF, 8F2, 8GSF, 9DF, 9GF, which the FC200 covers.

6) Brand-specific ECU Selection:

In terms of brand-specific ECU selection, the FC200 allows users to directly select BMW ECUs, while the Multi Prog provides the option to select both BMW ECUs and BMW series.

7) Opel and Mercedes ECU Support:

The FC200 offers a wider range of bench ECUs for Opel, with only one Delphi DCM3.7AP available on the Multi Prog. However, when it comes to Mercedes, both programmers provide comprehensive support, with no notable differences except for the absence of Delphi CRD 11 in the Multi Prog.

8) Renault ECU Support:

The Multi Prog outperforms the FC200 in terms of Renault ECU support. The FC200 has a shorter list of supported Renault ECUs compared to the Multi Prog, which offers a wide range of Renault ECUs, including Continental ECUs like SID301, SID205, SID306, SID309, EMS3134, S3000, and Modules-XC164CS.

9) Asian Car ECU Support:

For Mazda, Honda, and Toyota ECUs, both programmers offer similar support with no notable differences. However, the Multi Prog excels in supporting Nissan ECUs due to its compatibility with Renaut engines. Additionally, the Multi Prog supports a few Denso generation ECUs that are not available on the FC200. The Multi Prog also provides support for three Continental ECUs that are not found on the FC200.

10) Korean Car ECU Support:

When it comes to Korean car brands like Kia and Hyundai, both programmers offer similar support. However, the FC200 supports SIM240 and SIM2K341 TCU, which the Multi Prog does not. Therefore, the FC200 is the winner in this category.

11) American Car ECU Support:

For Ford, the FC200 supports three types of ECUs, namely DCM3.5, DCM6.1, SID209, Bosch DCU17PC43, which are not available on the Multi Prog. In terms of GM Caddilac and Cheverolety, there are no notable differences between the two programmers. However, the FC200 offers support for GPEC2, GPEC2A, GPEC3 ECUs in Chrysler, which are not available on the Multi Prog. The FC200 also supports Bosch ME2.8.1 ECUs, which the Multi Prog does not have.

12) Gearbox TCU Support:

When it comes to VAG, the FC200 supports ZF-8HP gearboxes (8HP50, 8HP70, 8HP75, 8HP90), while the Multi Prog supports DQ380, DQ381, DQ500, DQ501Gen2, VL381, 8HP45/55/65 TCUs. They cover different TCUs, with the Multi Prog offering support for more DQ TCUs.

In terms of BMW TCUs, both programmers offer similar support, with the Multi Prog having one additional type of BMW TCU compared to the FC200.

For PSA, the FC200 supports ZF-9HP TCU, not.

13) Script Function:

The Multi Prog offers a unique script function, allowing users to create their own scripts. This is a significant advantage and provides greater flexibility. Xhorse also plans to add built-in scripts in future updates.

14) Subscription Fee and Updates:

The Multi Prog does not require a subscription fee and offers lifetime free updates, making it a cost-effective option. On the other hand, the FC200 requires users to purchase a license annually, which costs $200 per year.

15) VAG MQB48 NEC35XX Immobilizer Data:

Both the Multi Prog and FC200 can read VAG MQB48 NEC35XX immo data and correct mileage.

In conclusion, the Xhorse Multi Prog stands out as the better option due to its extensive chip and MCU reading capabilities, as well as its ability to read immo data. It is recommended to have both tools on hand to ensure backup in case one fails.

More information about auto ecu programmer, please visit https://www.autonumen.com .